Hilda C. Landers Library & Archives

I found the beginning of The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins a little bit slow going, but once the Games themselves started, I was riveted. The premise of the fall of the United States and the rise of Panem was fascinating. I would enjoy a world-building book that described life in each of the 12 districts and the Capitol, along with the rebellion and the destroyed 13th district, much more than I would more stories about these characters.

Availability: SMCM Library and COSMOS
Review Submitted by: Rebecca Thayer
Rating: Recommended

Read Mandy Reinig’s reviews of The Hunger Games,  Catching Fire and Mockingjay.

I would recommend this book but with reservations. I am usually kept on the edge of my seat by Stephen King books, but this one didn’t quite do it for me. Most of the action took place in flashbacks, which makes it seem as though the story is dragging and the reader is just waiting for real action to happen in the present. The plot was original enough — a stranger showing up with a car from another dimension/planet/somewhere unknown. The car continues to do strange things, acting as a portal. I certainly don’t feel as though I wasted my time reading this book, I just would not add it to the top of my to-read list.

Availability: COSMOS
Review Submitted by: Samantha Schwartz
Rating: Recommended with reservations

I thought this was a beautifully written play. The cast of characters is small and the dialogue is simple, but within that, William Inge is able to weave a complex portrayal of human desperation. The play centers around Lola and Doc, a long-married couple that rent out their spare room to Marie. Maire at once embodies the two didactic ideals of a what Lola and Doc think a young woman should be: Lola sees Marie as a flirt and encourages her fling with the school jock while Doc sees Marie as pure and “a good girl.” As the play goes on, Doc is forced to realize that Lola’s image is closer to the truth, bringing up memories of Lola and Doc’s own relationship and the cause of their shotgun wedding.

While the plot of the play itself is average, the dialogue conveys so much about the desperation that Lola and Doc feel about their marriage which Doc never wanted. Doc knows he owes it to Lola to love her, while Lola wants only to be truly cared for by her husband.

In many ways, this play reminded me of Tennessee William’s A Streetcar Named Desire. To anyone who is a fan of that play, Inge’s dialogue and stage direction will be welcomed and familiar.

Availability: SMCM Library (Four Plays)
Review Submitted by: Lauren Grey, SMCM Alumn ’11
Rating:  Highly Recommended

I’d been hearing a lot of buzz about this book lately. I was a little apprehensive to read it because I was never really a fan of “young adult” books, but I feel the themes in this book transcended this categorization.

A review on the back of the book labels it “compulsively readable,” which is the best way for me to describe it. I don’t remember the last time I tore through a book that quickly. The story is about Hazel, a 16-year-old stage IV thyroid cancer survivor who just keeps holding on thanks to her miracle (fictional) drug. She grudgingly attends a support group where she meets Augustus Waters, and the two form a rare relationship. They begin bonding over books, and Hazel’s favorite, the fictional “An Imperial Affliction,” becomes what drives this novel’s plot. I don’t want to give any more of the story away. Suffice it to say, tears were shed—it was a powerful story.

My only beef with The Fault in Our Stars was the characters’ quirkiness. I’m not a fan of excessive quirkiness in characters (in books, movies, or TV) because I find it a bit unrealistic, but that’s just me. Their common personalities are a driving force in the plot, so it works here. I highly recommend this novel if you’re looking for a quick, unique, and moving read—I believe it’s in the works to become a movie, too.

Availability: USMAI
Review Submitted by: Jordan Gaines, Alum ’11
Rating:  Highly Recommended

I have not seen the movie and was excited to read the book before potentially seeing the movie. However, this book, while having an interesting story, was difficult to read since it jumped around from person to person without great transitions between characters. It made it hard to understand what was going on in the story and created the need to re-read pages to try to figure out what was happening. The overall story was interesting and expressed a compelling relationship between father and son and beyond in the wake of 9/11 but it would have been better if it were easier to read and follow.

Availability: SMCM Library, USMAI and COSMOS
Review Submitted by: Mandy Reinig
Rating: Recommended with Reservations

The Red Tent by Anita Diamant is the story that isn’t in the Bible: that of the wives of Jacob, Leah, Rachel, Zilpah and Bilhah, and Jacob’s only daughter, Dinah. Dinah narrates the story of the lives of her mothers, as she calls all of them, and her own life when she leaves them. I love historical fiction that tries to fill in the gaps of history, and this is a great example. I felt like I was sitting at Dinah’s feet, listening to her tell the story of her and her mothers.

Availability: COSMOS & USMAI
Review Submitted by: Rebecca Thayer
Rating:  Highly Recommended.

Included in the Millions list of upcoming titles are a few of the books the library summer reading program is offering as prizes; The Twelve by Justin Cronin, NW by Zadie Smith, Telegraph Avenue by Michael Chabon and Laura Lamont’s Life in Pictures by Emma Straub. Check out The Great Second-Half 2012 Book Preview to find out more about them.

2012 has already been a rich year for books, with new novels from Toni Morrison, Richard Ford, and Hilary Mantel and essay collections from Marilynn Robinson and Jonathan Franzen, to name just a fraction of what we’ve featured, raved about, chewed on, and puzzled over so far. But the remainder of this year (and the hazy beginning  of next year) is shaping up to be a jackpot of literary riches. In just a few short months, we’ll be seeing new titles from some of the most beloved and critically lauded authors working today, including Martin Amis, Zadie Smith, Michael Chabon, Junot Díaz, Alice Munro, Ian McEwan, George Saunders, and David Foster Wallace. Incredibly, there’s much more than that to get excited about, but, were we to delve into it further up here, we would risk this introduction consuming the many previews that are meant to follow.

See the first half, Most Anticipated: The Great 2012 Book Preview.

It has been years (probably at least five, since the last Harry Potter book release in 2007) since I can honestly say I’ve read a book that I couldn’t put down. Complications was that for me this week.

Complications is Gawande’s first book, published in 2002. At the time, he was a surgical resident in the Boston area, where today he is currently a cancer surgeon. Since, he has written two other books, is a staff writer for The New Yorker, and an associate professor of surgery at Harvard. You may have seen him on the news recently being interviewed about Obamacare.

The central theme of the book is the fallibility of doctors. Has a doctor ever told you, “You may have such-and-such, and there’s a 5% chance that this-and-that will happen”? They most likely made that statistic up on the spot. Granted, it’s not JUST a number—the doctor is using his or her past experience with the disease or problem, and may remember reading up on studies or past cases. They’re also quickly factoring in your age, gender, and overall health. Mostly, however, that “5% chance” statement is pure speculation intended to reassure you and gain your trust that you are, in fact, in competent hands.

Gawande is not untruthful or boastful about anything. I have always had a fascination with doctors—even the slimier ones I’ve had—because it’s a job I know I could never do. My fascination has grown as I now go to grad school at a medical college and hospital—I not only pass doctors everyday, but am surrounded by (and will soon have to TA) future doctors. To enter a thoughtful, reflective surgeon’s head, as I could while reading this book, was invaluable. He touches on his own experiences; details of studies on doctors’ and surgeons’ errors; surgical technologies; and fascinating anecdotes including, but not limited to, gastric bypass, flesh-eating bacteria, chronic blushing, and extreme nausea during pregnancy. His style is clear and easy. Other than the obvious Marley and Me, it’s probably the first non-fiction book I’ve ever teared up while reading. (Okay, Marley and Me may have been more than just “tearing up.”)

I had gotten this book for my boyfriend, a surgical tech student, for Christmas as a recommendation from my grad school counselor. Now into his first surgical tech job, he’s looking forward to re-reading it. I just read the last sentence an hour ago and I’m already looking forward to reading more of Gawande’s writing. I highly recommend this book to anyone who has ever questioned a doctor’s prescriptions, instructions, or motives before—which is probably most of us. I took a lot of out my reading and hope this review has inspired others to as well.

Availability: USMAI
Review Submitted by: Jordan Gaines, Alum ’11
Rating:  Must Read

According to the back cover of my copy of this short play, “In The Birthday Party, a musician escapes to a dilapidated boarding house, where he falls victim to the shadowy, ritualized violence of two men who have followed him from his sinister past.” I know, sounds like a great read from the start, right? I found this caption intriguing enough to want to find out who this character is and what happened in his past, but after reading the play, I know just about as much as when I began.

The entire play takes place at a boarding house where we witness the odd relationship between Stanley, the only boarder, and Meg, the seemingly not-all-there owner of the house (she’s married, but the husband isn’t in the play very much). Two new boarders arrive who apparently know something about Stanley’s past that Stanley is trying to run away from. (I’m not worried about giving anything away because I have no clue what he was involved in). That evening, Meg throws Stanley a birthday party which involves a lot of drinking and odd, unexplained cruelty that ultimately lead to Stanley leaving the boarding house.

If my summary seems odd and random, it is because that is how the play read to me. I didn’t find any of the characters likable or relatable and the play was filled with monologues that I am sure were meant to have a deep meaning to illuminate the point of the play, but were completely lost on me. I also had an issue with the stage directions. I have read a lot of plays and would never use a lack of stage directions as a defect of the writer (Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf is almost famous for its lack of stage direction) but I do feel that when a writer decides to include them, it should be to help emphasize a theme or characterization. In The Birthday Party, I had a difficult time figuring out what the stage directions were trying to accomplish or how they were helping to further the play.

While I may have enjoyed this play more if I was willing to take the time to study the text closely and analyze the possible meaning of the passages, the play as a whole left a sour taste in my mouth and I’m not sure I want to look that closely at it just yet. (If are any fans of this play read this post, please don’t take offense. I would honestly love to hear what you like about it).

Availability: SMCM Library (as part of The Complete Works of Harold Pinter)
Review Submitted by: Lauren Grey, SMCM Alumn ’11
Rating:  Not Recommended

Hotter Than That by Krin Gabbard claims to be the story of “The Trumpet, Jazz, and American Culture.” It’s actually a description of how masculine the trumpet is and how the author personally experiences the trumpet. Every chapter the author mentions how the trumpet is a pure form of masculine expression. As a woman, it makes me feel left out, and that if I played the trumpet, it would be lesser than a male performer. Even the little section about the history of female trumpeters is sprinkled with comments like, “Although she is tall, slim, and attractive, Jensen is all business when she plays.” (direct quote)

The last straw was at the end of the book, when he spends four pages summarizing the book, all about the masculinity of the trumpet. Only one paragraph mentions women at all, and in it he says, “At this point, it becomes clear why women can be as successful as men when they play the trumpet.” That’s good, but his reasoning is horrible. “If a woman… rips through a phrase like Armstrong or Gillespie at his most intense, we might say that she is expressing the masculine side of herself.” So, according to the author, a woman can’t be a good trumpet player if she isn’t in some way masculine.

The book has other issues, though. It’s poorly organized, with biographical chapters mixed in with chapters about the history and construction of the trumpet. Also, the author spends many pages describing his own personal preferences for the trumpet and how he learned the trumpet.

Availability: USMAI
Review Submitted by: Rebecca Thayer
Rating:  Not Recommended